NEW YORK (AP) 鈥� A jury ordered Academy Award-winning filmmaker Paul Haggis Thursday to pay at least $7.5 million to a woman who accused him of rape in one of several #MeToo-era cases that have put Hollywood notables鈥� behavior on trial this fall. Jurors also plan to award additional punitive damages.
Veering from sex to red-carpet socializing to Scientology, the civil court trial pitted Haggis, known for writing best picture Oscar winners 鈥淢illion Dollar Baby鈥� and 鈥淐rash,鈥� against Haleigh Breest, a publicist who met him while working at movie premieres in the early 2010s.
After hugging her lawyers, Breest said she was 鈥渧ery grateful鈥� for the verdict as she left court. In a statement released later, she said she was thankful 鈥渢hat the jury chose to follow the facts 鈥� and believed me.鈥�
Haggis said he was 鈥渧ery disappointed in the results."
"I'm going to continue to, with my team, fight to clear my name," he said as he left the courthouse with his three adult daughters. One had wept on a sister's shoulder as the verdict was delivered.
After a screening afterparty in January 2013, Haggis offered Breest a lift home and invited her to his New York apartment for a drink.
Haggis then subjected her to unwanted advances and ultimately compelled her to perform oral sex and raped her despite her entreaties to stop. the publicist was and, while sometimes seeming 鈥渃onflicted,鈥� initiated kisses and oral sex in an entirely consensual interaction. He said he couldn鈥檛 recall whether they had intercourse.
After a day of deliberating, jurors sided with Breest, who said she suffered psychological and professional consequences from her encounter with Haggis. She sued in late 2017.
While awarding her $7.5 million to compensate for suffering, the jury concluded that punitive damages should also be awarded. Jurors return Monday for more court proceedings to help them decide that amount.
The verdict came weeks after another civil jury, in the federal courthouse next door, didn鈥檛 sexually abuse fellow actor and then-teenager Anthony Rapp in 1986. Meanwhile, 鈥淭hat 鈥�70s Show鈥� actor and former movie magnate are on trial, separately, on criminal rape charges in Los Angeles. Both deny the allegations, and Weinstein is appealing a conviction in New York.
All four cases followed the #MeToo upwelling of denunciations, disclosures and demands for accountability about sexual misconduct, triggered by October 2017 news reports on decades of allegations about Weinstein.
Breest, in particular, said she decided to sue Haggis because his public condemnations of Weinstein infuriated her.
Four other women also testified that they experienced forceful, unwelcome passes 鈥� and in one case, rape 鈥� by Haggis in separate encounters going back to 1996. None of the four took legal action.
The Associated Press generally does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Breest has done.
Haggis . His defense, meanwhile, introduced jurors to several women 鈥� including ex-wife and former longtime 鈥淒allas鈥� cast member Deborah Rennard 鈥� who said the screenwriter-director took it in stride when they rebuffed his romantic or sexual overtures.
During three weeks of testimony, the trial scrutinized that Breest sent to friends about what happened with Haggis, before and after the night in question, and some differences between their testimony and what they said in early court papers.
The two sides debated whether Haggis was physically capable of carrying out the alleged attack eight weeks after a spinal surgery. Psychology experts offered dueling perspectives about what one called widespread misconceptions about rape victims鈥� behavior, such as assumptions that victims would have no subsequent contact with their attackers.
And jurors heard extensive testimony about the Church of Scientology, the religion founded by science fiction and fantasy author L. Ron Hubbard in the 1950s. Haggis was an adherent for decades before publicly renouncing, and denouncing, Scientology in 2009.
Through testimony from Haggis and other ex-members, his defense argued that the church set out to discredit him and might have had something to do with the lawsuit.
No witnesses said they knew that Haggis鈥� accusers or Breest鈥檚 lawyers had Scientology ties, and his lawyers acknowledged that Breest herself does not. Still, Haggis lawyer Priya Chaudhry sought to persuade jurors that there were 鈥渢he footprints, though maybe not the fingerprints, of Scientology鈥檚 involvement here.鈥�
The church said in a statement that it has no involvement in the matter, arguing that Haggis is trying to shame his accusers with an 鈥渁bsurd and patently false鈥� claim. Breest鈥檚 lawyers, Ilann Maazal and Zoe Salzman, have called it 鈥渁 shameful and unsupported conspiracy theory.鈥�
The Canadian-born Haggis penned episodes of such well-known series as 鈥淒iff鈥檙ent Strokes鈥� and 鈥淭hirtysomething鈥� in the 1980s. He broke into movies with a splash with 鈥淢illion Dollar Baby鈥� and 鈥淐rash,鈥� which he also directed and co-produced. Each film won the Academy Award for best picture, for 2004 and 2005 respectively, and Haggis also won a screenwriting Oscar for 鈥淐rash.鈥�
His other credits include the screenplays for the James Bond movies 鈥淐asino Royale鈥� and 鈥淨uantum of Solace.鈥�
___
Associated Press journalist Ted Shaffrey contributed.
Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press
